Author
|
Topic: 20eight's puzzle(s) (Read 79218 times)
|
|
SM
|
And solution to Inertia 4: DodebepThis one was significantly harder than the previous three, but these are quite enjoyable!! Keep them coming!! (I see Intertia 5 is already out...)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
So long and thanks for all the fish.
|
|
|
|
20eight
|
this is certainly harder than the inertia series, but I'm not sure how much: refraction box - gutibuf
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
I see I have some catching up to do. I am away from the forum for a couple of days, and creative 20eight has posted a whole bundle of fun puzzles  Here is my solution to Combination Lock 4 ( camydyb): xugixolIt's the same principle as Combination Lock 3, I just needed a big fuel tank for the engine. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
And here is the Inertia series (nice and light ones!): Inertia: relenod Inertia 2: hepyfog Inertia 3: rakybex Inertia 4: ribaban Inertia 5: hesaxav1-3 are pretty much the same. I switched tactics between 3 and 4, and 5 is similar to 4 again, only a lot slower.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
20eight
|
I thought that 5 would be it for the inertia series. But I hadn't noticed (as Rene did) that you could simply place a ramp on top of the furnace; So here's... Inertia 6 - danimof
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
20eight
|
I figure that this one is pretty darn hard. But I've thought that about others... Catalyst - jydukag
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
geej66
|
Here's my solution to Equilibrium - tybogyd - it's not elegant in any sense I'm pretty sure it works for any two randoms, but I've thought that before...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
Here is my solution to Mobius Strip: jubudafAnd for Equilibrium: leryricEquilibrium is pretty hard. I could not find an elegant solution. So in the end, I had to go for a really slow one. I might revisit this one later to find something better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
OK, is this solution you had in mind, or is there going to be an Inertia 7 as well ?  Solution to Inertia 6: rodalod
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Rene
|
I figure that this one is pretty darn hard. But I've thought that about others... Catalyst - jydukagDid you have any particular reason why you thought that this one would be hard?  Solution to Catalyst: cekicic
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
20eight
|
In Equilibrium, I had only thought of the door keys as means of getting information out of the the mechanism. I didn't figure that they would be used to stop and start the mechanism as did geej66 ( tybogyd) and, to a greater extent, Rene ( leryric). Nice work. Rene, yes, rodalod was what I was shooting for in Inertia 6. Now I can put that one to rest. And, no, I didn't figure on Catalyst being that easy. But I did figure on you being the one to expose it if it was. But anyway, it kinda nice to have inadvertantly created an easy version as a warm up for what I had in mind (hopefully)... Catalyst 2 - lodadim
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bucky
|
Catalyst 2: vakytug. The puzzle is equivalent to its predecessor after feeding a few barrels into the pipes at the beginning. Accordingly, I applied the appropriate transformation to Rene's solution to the original.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 10, 2007, 06:38:13 AM by Bucky »
|
Logged
|
That is the most ingenious method of solving an impossible puzzle that I have ever seen.
|
|
|
|
20eight
|
ok, I've really done my homework on this one. Assuming that I'm not missing anything (ha ha), this one ought to be even harder than Catalyst 1 was supposed to be... Catalyst 3 - lenybir
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Bucky
|
ok, I've really done my homework on this one. Assuming that I'm not missing anything (ha ha), this one ought to be even harder than Catalyst 1 was supposed to be... Catalyst 3 - lenybirThat puzzle is just plain unreasonable. It takes a minimum of over 7500 ticks to find out whether our solution is right or off by a tick for some reason we didn't anticipate. Please show some respect to the puzzle solvers; I don't want to have to spend 2 hours making sure my solution works for all values of the ? crate. In it's current form, it's not even worth attempting. And the solution would be the same as the last two but with a ~250x30 timing device on the front end.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 11, 2007, 05:05:04 AM by Bucky »
|
Logged
|
That is the most ingenious method of solving an impossible puzzle that I have ever seen.
|
|
|
|
 |